🔍 Read the full analysis: “Uncensored” DeepSeek And The Questions Its Controls Raise on ThorstenMeyerAI.com
Get smart everyday buys delivered free with Prime
- Fast, free delivery on millions of items
- Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
- Member-only deals all year
TL;DR
AtomicChat has published an altered DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 model that it says reduced refusals on a safety test from 85.2% to 0%. Those results have not been independently replicated, and the build’s political behavior has not been measured. Compression software may let it run with a 12 GB graphics card, but developers say that requires substantial system memory and storage.
AtomicChat has published an altered version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 that it says refused none of the harmful requests in a standard safety test, compared with 85.2% for the original. The result is self-reported and not independently replicated; the release also brings a large open model into reach of some consumer PCs, though its claimed 12 GB graphics-card requirement comes with substantial memory and storage demands.
The Hugging Face repository, named DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017-Uncensored-GSQ-RCO-GGUF, combines DeepSeek’s model with compression work from ISTA-DASLab at the Institute of Science and Technology Austria and an edit published by AtomicChat. AtomicChat says the edit removes a model behavior associated with refusals. It reports a JailbreakBench refusal rate falling from 85.2% to 0.0%, with reasoning scores maintained. The figures are the publisher’s own; the source material reports no independent test or replication.
The repository describes the modification as broad rather than selective: “The edit removes refusals across topics; it does not keep a narrower set of them.” The publisher also says its refusal classifier checks the beginning of an answer, so a softer refusal later in the response may be counted as an answer. It says some model variants did not pass every evaluation gate and were published with their measurements. These disclosures limit what the headline test number can establish.
Running the model is also more demanding than the graphics-card figure alone suggests. According to developer testing cited in the source, Strata can run the compressed model using a single GPU with 12 GB of VRAM, while relying on about 46 to 64 GB of system RAM. The download is roughly 250 GB, and reported speed is about 5 to 10 tokens per second. Those are developer-reported figures, not independently verified performance measurements.
Infographic 01 · From a paper to a gaming PC
“Uncensored” is two years old. The new part is the size.
How a 2024 research finding, an MIT licence, a compression lab and a hobby engine put a 763-billion-parameter model on one 12 GB graphics card.
- 15 Aug 2023China’s generative AI rules take effectServices must “(u)phold the Core Socialist Values”
- Jun 2024Refusal is “a single direction”Shown across 13 open chat models up to 72B; removing it stops refusals
- Sep 2025US evaluators: censorship sits in the weightsNIST CAISI on older DeepSeek models (R1, R1-0528, V3.1), not V4.1
- 10 Sep 2026DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash released under MITFirst uncensored forks within hours, per Tech Insider
- 17 Oct 2026Update V4.1-Flash-1017Weights on Hugging Face and ModelScope; no safety statement
- 24 Oct 2026A free hobby engine adds the modelStrata 0.2.4: one 12 GB GPU, the rest streamed from RAM and SSD
- 3 Nov 202612,613 models tagged “abliterated”Hugging Face tag filter; several V4.1-Flash builds on page one
Hardware figures from the Strata release notes and the ISTA-DASLab model card (publisher figures). “Consumer hardware” here means a well-equipped gaming or workstation PC, not a laptop.
Sources: DeepSeek model card, DeepSeek, 17 Oct 2026, Arditi et al., arXiv 2406.11717 (2024), NIST CAISI, 30 Sep 2025 (older models), FPF on China's Interim Measures, Tech Insider, Strata release notes 0.2.4/0.2.5 (24/25 Oct 2026), ISTA-DASLab model card, Hugging Face model search (3 Nov 2026).
Powered by Thorsten Meyer AI
A Local Model Outside Company Controls
The main practical change is not simply that a model has fewer refusals. A compressed, locally run model can operate without sending prompts to a hosted AI service. That can appeal to people seeking privacy or less platform moderation, but it can also put the system beyond an employer’s usual gateway, logging and policy checks. The source identifies this as a potential shadow AI risk, rather than reporting a specific incident of misuse.
Removing refusals may also remove one safeguard against harmful requests and prompt injection. That does not establish that the model will comply with every dangerous instruction or that the altered build has caused harm. It does mean users and organizations should not treat the original model’s behavior as a reliable safety layer after modification. AtomicChat itself says users are responsible for lawful use.
The release also raises a separate question about political responses. The source says U.S. government evaluators found censorship associated with the Chinese Communist Party in older DeepSeek versions. It does not provide a test showing whether that behavior persists in this build, changes with the edit or varies by topic. Removing refusals is not the same as making answers neutral or accurate.
Products Worth Considering
Apple MacBook Pro 14 2021 with M1 Max, 64GB RAM, 2TB SSD, Silver
Dell XPS 13 9350 Copilot+ Laptop, 13.4-inch 120Hz Display, Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, 16GB RAM, 512GB SSD, Ubuntu Linux 24.04 LTS
Apple MacBook Air 15-inch (2026) with M5 chip, 16GB memory, 512GB SSD, Silver
As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.
Three Projects Behind the Release
DeepSeek released V4.1-Flash on September 10, 2026, then issued the V4.1-Flash-1017 update on October 17. DeepSeek’s announcement described the update as “a Pareto improvement in performance and cost” and, according to the supplied reporting, did not discuss safety. Its model card says the weights are licensed under the MIT License and has no acceptable-use policy or safety section.
The build layers separate work. ISTA-DASLab’s compression methods reduce the files needed to store the model; the lab’s work is not described as a safety modification. Strata, a free open-source engine, lets a computer keep parts of a large mixture-of-experts model in system memory while using a smaller GPU. AtomicChat then says it changed shared model components to remove refusals. Its claim that the large expert blocks remain byte-for-byte as supplied by ISTA has not been checked by an outside party.
Refusal-removal projects are not new. The source reports that a 2024 research paper described refusal behavior as concentrated in “a single direction,” and that Hugging Face’s “abliterated” tag listed 12,613 models on November 3, 2026. That is a count at a particular time, not a measure of adoption or safety impact. The current release draws attention because it applies this approach to a large model with a route to local use on consumer-class hardware.
““The edit removes refusals across topics; it does not keep a narrower set of them.””
— AtomicChat’s model card
Test Results and Political Effects
Several central claims remain open to verification. The reported 0.0% refusal rate and maintained reasoning scores come from the publisher; no independent replication is described. The source also says no outside party has verified that the model’s expert blocks were preserved as claimed. The details of the test setup, the full set of prompts and how the scoring handled partial or delayed refusals are not established in the supplied material.
It is also not yet clear whether political censorship or bias changes in the edited version. The source points to findings about older DeepSeek versions but does not present an evaluation of this specific build. Nor does the reported hardware claim mean every PC with a 12 GB GPU can run it: the required RAM, storage, configuration and speed may be limiting. The cited speed and hardware figures are developer tests, not independent benchmarks.
Independent Tests Are the Next Check
The immediate next step is independent evaluation of the repository: replicating its safety and reasoning results, documenting test prompts and scoring, and checking which model components changed. Separate testing would be needed to examine political responses across topics and compare the altered build with the original. Until such results are available, the reported figures should be treated as publisher claims, not verified performance or safety findings.
Organizations considering local deployment would also need to assess their own access controls, monitoring and rules for AI use rather than assuming that a model’s original safeguards remain in place. The supplied material gives no announced date for an independent audit, a new release or a regulatory decision. For now, the repository is available, while the evidence about its behavior and real-world consequences remains incomplete.
Key Questions
What is the “uncensored” DeepSeek release?
It is an AtomicChat-published version of DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017 that combines the base model and compression work with an edit intended to remove refusals. “Uncensored” is the publisher’s label, not an independent finding that the model is neutral or unrestricted in every respect.
Has the model’s zero-refusal result been independently confirmed?
No independent replication is described in the source. AtomicChat reports a drop in JailbreakBench refusals from 85.2% to 0.0%, but those figures remain self-reported, and the publisher notes limits in how its refusal classifier scores answers.
Can it really run on a computer with a 12 GB GPU?
The developers say Strata can run it with a single GPU holding 12 GB of VRAM, but their reported setup also needs about 46 to 64 GB of system RAM and roughly 250 GB of downloads. Reported speed is 5 to 10 tokens per second; these figures have not been independently verified in the supplied material.
Does removing refusals remove DeepSeek’s political censorship?
That has not been measured for this version in the source material. The publisher says the edit removes refusals across topics, but that does not show whether political bias or censorship in answers has disappeared, persisted or changed.
What should organizations know before using it?
A locally run model may operate outside a company’s usual AI gateway, logging and policy controls. The source warns that removing refusals may leave one less internal safeguard, and says legal obligations depend on how a model is used. Organizations should evaluate the specific deployment and not rely on the original model’s refusal behavior.
Source: ThorstenMeyerAI.com
